Different
Formulation Strategies Produce Different Results
When choosing a horse feed, looking at the
guaranteed analysis can help you determine if the nutrition content of that
feed is appropriate for the age and activity level of your horse. You would
think that two products both contain 14% protein, 6% fat, etc. would be pretty
much the same feed. However, products with similar guaranteed analyses may be
manufactured using different formulation strategies and result in very
different feeds. This can affect the nutritional value for your horse. The most
common formulation strategies are “least-cost” formulas and “fixed” or “locked”
formulas. Both strategies have benefits and drawbacks. For premium horse feeds,
Purina uses “constant nutrition” formulation, a more nutritionally accurate
formulation.
Least-cost formulation allows a manufacturer to
adjust the ingredients in the formula based on cost. As long as the formula
still meets the guaranteed analysis, the manufacturer can change ingredients
used in the formula. In some circumstances, the different ingredients don’t
change the effectiveness of the diet, so it makes sense to meet the nutritional
needs of the animal in the least expensive way. There would be no benefit to
making a more expensive ration to achieve the same results. For instance, if
you are feeding cattle and being paid for weight gain and a least-cost formula
will not change the rate of gain or feed efficiency of the cattle, but will be
less expensive to feed, then that just makes good business sense.
However, in some cases, especially when feeding
horses, a major change in ingredients can dramatically alter the effectiveness
of the diet, even when the nutrient levels don’t change. A good example of this
is substituting cottonseed meal for soybean meal in a diet for growing horses.
Soybean meal and cottonseed meal may both have similar total protein content
and could be interchangeable in a formula to meet the protein guarantee. However,
cottonseed meal does not provide the same quality of protein as soybean meal to
support growth. So, in this case, the least-cost formula may be less expensive
per ton but the loss in animal performance and growth will negate any cost
savings. In addition to potential for reduced performance, there is always the
potential for reduced palatability and digestive upset in horses when large
shifts in ingredients occur in their feed.
With fixed or locked formulas, the same ingredients
and amounts are used every time the feed is made, regardless of price or
nutritional variation of those ingredients. This sounds like the most
consistent way to make horse feed; however, there is a significant drawback.
All ingredients, even high-quality ingredients, have variation in nutritional
content. For instance, all oats will not have the same protein or mineral
content. If the formula is completely locked and does not take into account the
nutritional content of individual ingredients, the level of nutrition in the finished
product will vary.
Horses do benefit from consistency in their diets,
but they don’t have specific requirements for certain ingredients. Ingredients
provide nutrients the horse needs. So, while a fixed formula allows for the
same amount of ingredient in every bag, it may not offer the same level of
nutrition. For example, a horse feed made of 49% oats, 20% beet pulp, 16% corn,
8% alfalfa and 7% soybean meal would average 14% protein, using the average
book values for these ingredients. However, with typical variations in protein
content of these ingredients, the end product could range from 12.4% to 21.1%
protein. Other nutrient levels will vary as well. While a fixed formula does
insure a consistent ingredient profile, it won’t provide the most consistent
level of nutrition for the horse.
“Constant Nutrition” formulation is a key component
of the Purina® FeedGuard® Nutrition System. This strategy provides consistent,
reliable nutrition in every bag of premium Purina® horse feed. Under the
Purina® FeedGuard® Nutrition System, stringent quality standards are set for
ingredients purchased only from an approved list of suppliers that meet those
strict criteria. Then, when ingredients arrive at a manufacturing facility,
they are inspected, sampled and analyzed for nutrient levels. This is more
accurate than using published book values or supplier averages for nutrient
levels of ingredients. If an ingredient is approved, then the tested
nutritional content is entered into the formulation system, which then makes
small adjustments in amounts of ingredients to maintain consistent nutrient
concentrations in the finished product. There are strict restrictions for how
much adjustment is allowed to ensure consistency in formulation. For example,
the amount of soybean meal may be adjusted slightly to compensate for lower
protein in another ingredient, but cottonseed meal could not be substituted for
soybean meal. This formulation strategy ensures that horses receive the most
consistent nutrition possible, and that horse owners get exactly what they pay
for.
Great article. I agree with the soy protien. I do not use Purina feed at this time, but i do believe in the soy bean based feeds like Patriot, which i use. My horses are easy EASY keepers (so blessed), so i do not like the added amplify nugget in the senior and HE. I do like Strategy which i use from time to time in a mix when my horses are in high performance mode. Great piece and i love learning about horse nutrition. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteAn informative article about the fact that different horse feed formulations yield different results. Meeting the nutritional needs of the horse in the least expensive way is a good point but the ingredients and the nutritional values can often vary. Horse feeds are available as bulk or bagged custom mixes.
ReplyDelete